RevOps & pipeline

RevOps intent platform built on public demand, not inferred scores

Your stack should answer who raised their hand this week — in their words — and prove which thread drove revenue. That is revenue OS infrastructure, not another enrichment vendor.

Why RevOps teams outgrow contact databases

Apollo-class tools optimize who to email. RevOps needs to know who is already in-market — comparing vendors, venting about pricing, or asking for alternatives in public. Wavly ingests that language, scores it to your ICP, and keeps the full attribution chain in Pipeline.

External + first-party in one graph

Public threads are one ingestion layer. A single snippet on your domain adds pricing visits, scroll depth, and form moments to the same Demand Graph. RevOps sees off-site intent and on-site behavior without duct-taping UTMs across five tools.

Governance RevOps can defend

Human approval before anything posts. Team RBAC on Pro+. Scale roadmap covers SSO, audit logs, and DPA — built for serious pipeline programs, with Free and Indie as land-and-expand on the identical runtime.

FAQ

Is Wavly a RevOps intent platform or a scraping tool?
Revenue operating infrastructure. Public signal discovery is one layer; orchestration (draft replies, Signal-to-Page, Pipeline attribution, learning loops) is the product. We are not priced or positioned as “Reddit lead alerts.”
How does this compare to Bombora or 6sense?
Third-party intent infers interest from cookies, topics, and IP. Wavly uses explicit buyer language in public threads plus optional first-party behavior — phrase-level intent you can quote in a standup.
Can RevOps attribute revenue to a specific thread?
Yes. Each approved reply links to a tracked Signal-to-Page; signups and MRR webhook back to the originating signal. One chain: signal → reply → click → page → signup.